Yeah I believe the nature is mystical enough 😄 no need to add anything super to it ^^
Do I believe in Spirit? I believe that matter is both spirit and physical. I don't believe in an undividable soul. But I do think it is okay to call our immaterial mind 'soul'. But it's just as much patterns as its material equivalent.
Regarding stuff like reincarnation: I don't think it's impossible for the same pattern to re-apear in a new form as to be essentially reborn but I think it's not necessary for the theory to hold ☺️
Out of body experiences have in my opinion sadly been sufficiently debunked. People who claimed to have had them, were never able to demonstrate to see anything that would have been only possible for them to see if they would leave their body. I think most of them just misinterpreted an ego death for an OoBE
Other dimensions?
Possibly in the quantum physical sense of the multiverse.
Definitely in the sense that every observer creates it's own reality sphere which is essentially his personal dimension ^^
“When particles interact, they don't simply exchange energy or momentum - they exchange information, update their states, respond to their environment. In other words, they observe and are observed. The wave function collapse that occurs in measurement is not a unique phenomenon but the most fundamental example of how reality crystallizes through interaction.
.
This evolutionary process operates through what Wheeler called "the self-excited circuit" - a feedback loop where observers and observations mutually shape each other.”
This feed back loop is similar to what I was saying about magnetism 🧲 and electricity ⚡️.
I think they feed back on themselves but also on each other.
.
I didn’t understand why least prevails. ❓
The resolution, like crystallization in a supercooled fluid, often comes as a sudden cascade. One reality bubble must give way to another, and again the principle of least action prevails. The new configuration might be painful, but it requires less energy than maintaining the increasingly strained friction of faithfulness.
Well now you've almost read the complete basics of my framework 🌱😊
I find it so incredibly compelling as it stays completely clear of anything supernatural and yet explains everything ^^
"least action prevails" is a fundamental rule of efficiency! It's all about doing nothing unnecessary. A soap bubble will optimize for minimal surface tension, never suddenly forming a pyramid, always a sphere 😊
It's one of the characteristics of intelligence, you will find in the last part about evolution ;)
"This intelligence reveals itself through several fundamental characteristics:
1. Efficiency and Sufficiency: The universe operates with remarkable economy, always finding the most efficient solutions while maintaining the richness and diversity of experience."
Nature in general I can see working with efficiency and sufficiency but I do NOT see those two items working in many humans. Many humans never have ENOUGH. And WASTE seems prevalent. Can you give more detail for human behavior?
Efficiency is not a process that cares for composite resources.
The type of waste humans create and the type of endless hunger is still bound by the laws of equal exchange. a human cant overconsume what hasnt been produced.
I find it easiest to understand this through other examples in nature we behave similar to in nature. We are like a wildfire. we don't burn sustainably and consume our fuel so fast that in the process this flame will definitely extinguish itself.
But nature as a whole doesn't care for that. it just says for a flame this bright you will need that much energy. and you wont have a flame brighter that it has energy for.
But even humans "TRY" to be efficient and sufficient. you see it at the scales of market. we are very efficient in our capitalism xD
We simply are incredibly limited in our empathy and perspective. and this type of perceived "inefficiency" is for me also seen in nature. its the activation energy needed to catalyze a new mode of even more efficient reality.
In a chemical reaction that enables a perfect use of energy, we often first need to input energy to kickstart the process. if the molecules would be perfectly synchronized they wouldnt the amount of energy actually required as the energy set free from one molecule could kickstart the reaction for the next and so on.
but thats not how reality works; in the real world there is friction in systems. that friction is necessary for energy transfer to allow for complexity in creation. we humans are simply a macrosystem with a lot of friction that once fully activated will alow for even more efficient modes of energy capture and use.
Just look at the earth holistically. yes biological life seems to gambit a lot of safety by allowing us to so rapidly progress and burn up the resources it produced over millennia, but if the gambit works out through solar technology, fusion and bio engineering, the earth will be able to unlock completely new modes of energy capture.
I think of what happens currently as a transition period that is turbulent but can't be avoided.
I met a man who discovered cold fusion. He told me he talked to Oliver Stone about making a movie 🎥 to promote cold fusion. Years later Oliver made THE SAINT as promised.
Oh no... seems like my reply to this wasn't attached to this comment..
if you look at the comments of this post you will see that I responded 3days ago to this question xD
but here I copy and paste it again:
Yeah I believe the nature is mystical enough 😄 no need to add anything super to it ^^
Do I believe in Spirit? I believe that matter is both spirit and physical. I don't believe in an undividable soul. But I do think it is okay to call our immaterial mind 'soul'. But it's just as much patterns as its material equivalent.
Regarding stuff like reincarnation: I don't think it's impossible for the same pattern to re-apear in a new form as to be essentially reborn but I think it's not necessary for the theory to hold ☺️
Out of body experiences have in my opinion sadly been sufficiently debunked. People who claimed to have had them, were never able to demonstrate to see anything that would have been only possible for them to see if they would leave their body. I think most of them just misinterpreted an ego death for an OoBE
Other dimensions?
Possibly in the quantum physical sense of the multiverse.
Definitely in the sense that every observer creates it's own reality sphere which is essentially his personal dimension ^^
I have been out of body and have a handful of friends who can to.
Some with proof.
They told their friends or family that they had seen them with other people who the out of body person had never met or seen. And it was verified as true.
So yes, after reading the last 3? Posts, your position and explanation is becoming clearer. This fits into the idea that merely observing something changes things, right? I’m struggling to assimilate the idea of bubbles with my previous held beliefs of energetic waves with varying frequencies. I’ll need to read more to let these ideas fully sink in. Unfortunately, that will need to wait for another day. Thank you for your insights. I enjoy the way your posts stretch my mind.
There may not yet be proof for out of body experiences, but my father had one. He was in a terrible car accident in the middle of winter in the middle of the night. It was extremely cold and by the time he was found, he was nearly dead. When the ambulance came, they put my father’s body in the back. My dad said that he sat in the front with the driver.
Luckily, he survived, although he had a very long recovery. My father was not a particularly spiritual or mystical person. I had no reason not to believe him. Would you call this out of body experience? Or something else?
Yeah I believe the nature is mystical enough 😄 no need to add anything super to it ^^
Do I believe in Spirit? I believe that matter is both spirit and physical. I don't believe in an undividable soul. But I do think it is okay to call our immaterial mind 'soul'. But it's just as much patterns as its material equivalent.
Regarding stuff like reincarnation: I don't think it's impossible for the same pattern to re-apear in a new form as to be essentially reborn but I think it's not necessary for the theory to hold ☺️
Out of body experiences have in my opinion sadly been sufficiently debunked. People who claimed to have had them, were never able to demonstrate to see anything that would have been only possible for them to see if they would leave their body. I think most of them just misinterpreted an ego death for an OoBE
Other dimensions?
Possibly in the quantum physical sense of the multiverse.
Definitely in the sense that every observer creates it's own reality sphere which is essentially his personal dimension ^^
I feel transFORMED by your words!
“When particles interact, they don't simply exchange energy or momentum - they exchange information, update their states, respond to their environment. In other words, they observe and are observed. The wave function collapse that occurs in measurement is not a unique phenomenon but the most fundamental example of how reality crystallizes through interaction.
.
This evolutionary process operates through what Wheeler called "the self-excited circuit" - a feedback loop where observers and observations mutually shape each other.”
This feed back loop is similar to what I was saying about magnetism 🧲 and electricity ⚡️.
I think they feed back on themselves but also on each other.
.
I didn’t understand why least prevails. ❓
The resolution, like crystallization in a supercooled fluid, often comes as a sudden cascade. One reality bubble must give way to another, and again the principle of least action prevails. The new configuration might be painful, but it requires less energy than maintaining the increasingly strained friction of faithfulness.
Well now you've almost read the complete basics of my framework 🌱😊
I find it so incredibly compelling as it stays completely clear of anything supernatural and yet explains everything ^^
"least action prevails" is a fundamental rule of efficiency! It's all about doing nothing unnecessary. A soap bubble will optimize for minimal surface tension, never suddenly forming a pyramid, always a sphere 😊
It's one of the characteristics of intelligence, you will find in the last part about evolution ;)
"This intelligence reveals itself through several fundamental characteristics:
1. Efficiency and Sufficiency: The universe operates with remarkable economy, always finding the most efficient solutions while maintaining the richness and diversity of experience."
Nature in general I can see working with efficiency and sufficiency but I do NOT see those two items working in many humans. Many humans never have ENOUGH. And WASTE seems prevalent. Can you give more detail for human behavior?
Efficiency is not a process that cares for composite resources.
The type of waste humans create and the type of endless hunger is still bound by the laws of equal exchange. a human cant overconsume what hasnt been produced.
I find it easiest to understand this through other examples in nature we behave similar to in nature. We are like a wildfire. we don't burn sustainably and consume our fuel so fast that in the process this flame will definitely extinguish itself.
But nature as a whole doesn't care for that. it just says for a flame this bright you will need that much energy. and you wont have a flame brighter that it has energy for.
But even humans "TRY" to be efficient and sufficient. you see it at the scales of market. we are very efficient in our capitalism xD
We simply are incredibly limited in our empathy and perspective. and this type of perceived "inefficiency" is for me also seen in nature. its the activation energy needed to catalyze a new mode of even more efficient reality.
In a chemical reaction that enables a perfect use of energy, we often first need to input energy to kickstart the process. if the molecules would be perfectly synchronized they wouldnt the amount of energy actually required as the energy set free from one molecule could kickstart the reaction for the next and so on.
but thats not how reality works; in the real world there is friction in systems. that friction is necessary for energy transfer to allow for complexity in creation. we humans are simply a macrosystem with a lot of friction that once fully activated will alow for even more efficient modes of energy capture and use.
Just look at the earth holistically. yes biological life seems to gambit a lot of safety by allowing us to so rapidly progress and burn up the resources it produced over millennia, but if the gambit works out through solar technology, fusion and bio engineering, the earth will be able to unlock completely new modes of energy capture.
I think of what happens currently as a transition period that is turbulent but can't be avoided.
I met a man who discovered cold fusion. He told me he talked to Oliver Stone about making a movie 🎥 to promote cold fusion. Years later Oliver made THE SAINT as promised.
I can’t wait to absorb the rest of your posts!
Your work out shines my favorite view from Bohm.
🫧🫧🫧🫧🫧 efficiency and sufficiency, makes sense.
Your name is mystic but you stay away from supernatural.
Do you believe in spirit?
Do you know people who have gone out of body?
Do you bring up any other dimensions?
Oh no... seems like my reply to this wasn't attached to this comment..
if you look at the comments of this post you will see that I responded 3days ago to this question xD
but here I copy and paste it again:
Yeah I believe the nature is mystical enough 😄 no need to add anything super to it ^^
Do I believe in Spirit? I believe that matter is both spirit and physical. I don't believe in an undividable soul. But I do think it is okay to call our immaterial mind 'soul'. But it's just as much patterns as its material equivalent.
Regarding stuff like reincarnation: I don't think it's impossible for the same pattern to re-apear in a new form as to be essentially reborn but I think it's not necessary for the theory to hold ☺️
Out of body experiences have in my opinion sadly been sufficiently debunked. People who claimed to have had them, were never able to demonstrate to see anything that would have been only possible for them to see if they would leave their body. I think most of them just misinterpreted an ego death for an OoBE
Other dimensions?
Possibly in the quantum physical sense of the multiverse.
Definitely in the sense that every observer creates it's own reality sphere which is essentially his personal dimension ^^
These non speaking people were not believed to be telepathic.
At minute 43 of this podcast it speaks of going out of body.
TELEPATHY TAPES #7
13: she knew that a boy was going to die
14: precognition
17: talks to people who have passed
19: sometimes a curse
Talking to people who have passed are SAVANTS
23: belief is part of the ability
42: Read a book by putting his hand on it
43: goes out of body
https://youtu.be/LX5l1a_ZElU?si=O2eebFAPgP4ASC6e
I have been out of body and have a handful of friends who can to.
Some with proof.
They told their friends or family that they had seen them with other people who the out of body person had never met or seen. And it was verified as true.
So yes, after reading the last 3? Posts, your position and explanation is becoming clearer. This fits into the idea that merely observing something changes things, right? I’m struggling to assimilate the idea of bubbles with my previous held beliefs of energetic waves with varying frequencies. I’ll need to read more to let these ideas fully sink in. Unfortunately, that will need to wait for another day. Thank you for your insights. I enjoy the way your posts stretch my mind.
There may not yet be proof for out of body experiences, but my father had one. He was in a terrible car accident in the middle of winter in the middle of the night. It was extremely cold and by the time he was found, he was nearly dead. When the ambulance came, they put my father’s body in the back. My dad said that he sat in the front with the driver.
Luckily, he survived, although he had a very long recovery. My father was not a particularly spiritual or mystical person. I had no reason not to believe him. Would you call this out of body experience? Or something else?
There is always the possibility of simple hallucination.
In the end I remain skeptic to things I haven't experienced myself in a verifiable way. But this doesn't mean I dismiss the experience of others. 😊
In many ways reality seems a lot more flexible than most assume ^^
I hope the future will bring more insights.
Yes, that’s true. Good thoughts.